Invited Critique |

Effect of Thyroid Gland Volume in Preoperative Detection of Suspected Malignant Thyroid Nodules in a Multinodular Goiter—Invited Critique

Orlo H. Clark, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):563. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.6.563.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Erbil and colleagues have noted that thyroid cancer occurred more often in smaller thyroid glands and in bigger thyroid nodules. They report that 69 of 365 consecutive patients (18.9%) undergoing thyroidectomy for an MNG and a dominant thyroid nodule without a history of exposure to low-dose therapeutic radiation; clinical manifestations suggesting thyroid cancer, such as ipsilated lymph adenopathy or hoarseness; or a family history of thyroid cancer had thyroid cancer.

Overall, 100 thyroid cancers were identified in these 69 patients, 41 in the dominant nodule and 59 elsewhere in the thyroid gland. Smaller thyroid glands (< 38 mL) had a 48-fold increased rate of malignancy, whereas large nodules (> 7 mm) also had a significantly increased rate of being thyroid cancer. This overall cancer rate of 18.9% seems a little higher than expected. This may be due to the use of fine-needle aspiration cytology. The increased rate of thyroid cancer may also be caused by some selection or referral bias. The authors' findings seem to make sense, since patients with larger goiters have a reason other than cancer for an enlarged thyroid gland, including growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and insulin like growth factor. When I examine a patient with a thyroid nodule, I try to palpate the rest of the thyroid gland as well as the pyramidal lobe. When I palpate the pyramidal lobe, I know that there is a general stimulus to the thyroid gland so that a malignant neoplasm is less likely.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles