We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Laparoscopic Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Resection—Invited Critique

Richard J. Bold, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):591. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.6.591.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The technological development of necessary instruments (eg, roticulating linear staplers, ultrasonic dissectors, and flexible retractors) for the conduct of minimally invasive surgery has greatly facilitated the implementation of laparoscopic procedures within the field of surgical oncology. Although often technically feasible, until the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgical resections is proven, such procedures should not be broadly implemented. There is increasing evidence supporting minimally invasive surgical resection of malignant tumors of the colon, with early reports in tumors of the lungs, kidneys, prostate, and stomach.1 However, unlike these tumor sites, GISTs are uncommon; their classification is based primarily on histopathologic criteria (spindle cell neoplasm arising from the intestinal pacemaker cell of Cajal) and molecular biologic behavior (frequent mutational activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit) rather than anatomic site of origin. Huguet et al report the outcome of 33 patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic resection of GISTs, with 31 successfully completed laparoscopically. Although the series is small, the following aspects are notable: (1) laparoscopic resection of GISTs is feasible, has acceptable morbidity and mortality, and is associated with a reasonably short postoperative hospital stay duration; (2) patient selection is essential because these tumors were small (mean size, 3.9 cm), with preoperative CT accurately demonstrating the extent of disease; and (3) there have been no local recurrences during a mean follow-up of 13 months. Despite the observation that only half of the patients had a preoperative histopathologic diagnosis of GIST, the radiologic appearance of these tumors should allow the surgeon reasonable confidence in proceeding to resection. Although a direct comparison with an open approach was not given, the experience presented by the Mayo Clinic supports the feasibility and oncologic safety of laparoscopic resection of GISTs in selected patients by experienced minimally invasive surgeons.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles