TY - JOUR T1 - ASsociation between trauma quality indicators and outcomes for injured patients AU - Glance LG, Dick AW, Mukamel DB, Osler TM Y1 - 2012/04/01 N1 - 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1327 JO - Archives of Surgery SP - 308 EP - 315 VL - 147 IS - 4 N2 - Objective  To examine the association between the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) quality indicators and outcomes.Design  Cross-sectional study.Setting  Data from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study.Patients  We studied data from 210 942 patients admitted to 35 trauma centers in Pennsylvania between 2000 and 2009.Main Outcome Measures  Regression analyses were performed to examine the association between ACSCOT quality indicators and in-hospital mortality and death or major complications.Results  Seven of the ACSCOT quality indicators were associated with either increased (1) in-hospital mortality or (2) death or major complications. No head computed tomography scan in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13 was associated with a 4-fold increase in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.18-6.07) and a nearly 3-fold increased risk of death or major complications (AOR, 2.76; 95% CI 2.05-3.72). Gunshot wounds to the abdomen managed nonoperatively were associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in mortality (AOR, 4.80; 95% CI, 2.95-7.81). Femoral fractures treated with nonfixation were also strongly associated with mortality (AOR, 4.08; 95% CI, 2.50-6.66) and death or major complications (AOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.96-3.31).Conclusion  Several current ACSCOT quality indicators have a strong association with clinical outcomes. These findings should be interpreted with caution because some measures may lack face validity for identifying poor-quality care in complex patients with multiple injuries. SN - 0004-0010 M3 - doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1327 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.1327 ER -