TY  - JOUR
T1  - COmparative effectiveness of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following bariatric surgery
AU  - Birkmeyer NO, Finks JF, Carlin AM, et al
Y1  - 2012/11/01
N1  - 10.1001/archsurg.2012.2298
JO  - Archives of Surgery
SP  - 994
EP  - 998
VL  - 147
IS  - 11
N2  - Objective 
                  To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 3 predominant venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis strategies among patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Design 
                  Cohort study.Setting 
                  The Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, a statewide clinical registry and quality improvement program.Patients 
                  Twenty-four thousand seven hundred seventy-seven patients undergoing bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2012.Interventions 
                  Unfractionated heparin preoperatively and postoperatively (UF/UF), UF heparin preoperatively and low-molecular-weight heparin postoperatively (UF/LMW), and LMW heparin preoperatively and postoperatively (LMW/LMW).Main Outcome Measures 
                  Rates of VTE, hemorrhage, and serious hemorrhage (requiring >4 U of blood products or reoperation) occurring within 30 days of surgery.Results 
                  Overall, adjusted rates of VTE were significantly lower for the LMW/LMW (0.25%; P < .001) and UF/LMW (0.29%; P = .03) treatment groups compared with the UF/UF group (0.68%). While UF/LMW (0.22%; P = .006) and LMW/LMW (0.21%; P < .001) were similarly effective in patients at low risk of VTE (predicted risk <1%), LMW/LMW (1.46%; P = .10) seemed more effective than UF/LMW (2.36%; P = .90) for high-risk (predicted risk ≥1%) patients. There were no significant differences in rates of hemorrhage or serious hemorrhage among the treatment strategies.Conclusion 
                  Low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than UF heparin for the prevention of postoperative VTE among patients undergoing bariatric surgery and does not increase rates of bleeding.
SN  - 0004-0010
M3  - doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.2298
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.2298
ER  -