TY - JOUR T1 - EValuation of potential renal transplant recipients with computed tomography angiography AU - Smith D, Chudgar A, Daly B, Cooper M Y1 - 2012/12/01 N1 - 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1466 JO - Archives of Surgery SP - 1114 EP - 1122 VL - 147 IS - 12 N2 - Objectives  To determine the safety, clinical yield, and cost of computed tomography angiography (CTA) use in the workup of potential renal transplant recipients.Design  Single-site, retrospective review of medical, surgical, and radiologic records.Setting  Large university tertiary care center.Patients  Potential recipients of transplants from living donors.Interventions  Computed tomography with and without 100 mL of iodixanol intravenous contrast enhancement as part of the preoperative workup.Main Outcome Measures  Mean pre- and post-CTA estimated glomerular filtration rate and number of patients requiring emergent dialysis after CTA, number of patients who had their treatment changed by CTA findings, patient predictors of significant CTAs, and cost per significant CTA.Results  From July 20, 2006, through December 10, 2010, a total of 179 transplant candidates underwent CTA. Forty-two patients were predialysis at the time of CTA. Mean (SD) serum creatinine levels in this group were unchanged after CTA (5.06 [2.13] mg/dL vs 5.00 [2.28] mg/dL [to convert to micromoles per liter, multiply by 88.4], P = .49), and no patients required subsequent emergent dialysis. Forty-one patients (22.9%) had their treatment changed by CTA findings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed 3 patient history and physical criteria that predicted significant CTA findings: chronic infection (odds ratio, 10.91; 95% CI, 2.72-43.69; P < .001), patient weight less than 69 kg (3.11; 1.49-6.51; P < .001), and ventral torso surgical scarring (4.13; 1.57-10.84; P < .001). Diagnostic cost per significant CTA study was $2660, with an estimated reduced cost of $1480 per significant study with screening using 1 of the 3 predictors.Conclusion  Diagnostic CTA is a safe and cost-effective procedure for both operative planning and screening for potentially prohibitive abdominal disease. SN - 0004-0010 M3 - doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1466 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1466 ER -