TY  - JOUR
T1  - POtential margin distortion in breast tissue by specimen mammography
AU  - Clingan R, Griffin M, Phillips J, Coberly W, Jennings W
Y1  - 2003/12/01
N1  - 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1371
JO  - Archives of Surgery
SP  - 1371
EP  - 1374
VL  - 138
IS  - 12
N2  - Hypothesis 
    There is a potential for margin distortion associated with the use of a compression plate in specimen mammography (SM) devices.Design 
    Prospective observational study.Setting 
    Two tertiary care teaching hospitals.Patients 
    Breast biopsy tissue dimensions were recorded in 15 patients undergoing 18 operations before and after SM (group 1). After review of these data, we supervised the positioning of tissue for SM and obtained measurements for 12 breast biopsy specimens from 12 additional patients before and after SM (group 2).Main Outcome Measures 
    Breast biopsy specimen dimensions recorded before and after SM, including length, width, and depth (the specimen depth along the axis of compression); data on age, menopausal status, hormone therapy, and the presence or absence of calcifications or tumor; and a national telephone survey on technique and understanding of SM at 21 institutions.Results 
    The specimen depth in group 1 was markedly decreased (P<.001) along the axis of compression. The mean length and width of the specimens were marginally increased by the effect of the SM device. Specimen depth in group 2 was unchanged when minimal pressure was used on the compression plate. Tissue was adequately immobilized in both groups, and all lesions were identified by SM. Our survey revealed that 71% of hospitals reported using firm compression in SM, and diverse techniques were employed.Conclusions 
    This study demonstrates the potential for specimen margin distortion with compression SM. Undue specimen compression is common in routine SM. Surgeon oversight in the method of securing the specimen within the SM container will minimize or avoid the potential for margin distortion.
SN  - 0004-0010
M3  - doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1371
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1371
ER  -