TY  - JOUR
T1  - Injection site mass following sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: Comment on “occurrence of prolonged injection site mass with methylene blue but not isosulfan blue after sentinel node procedure”
AU  - Bland KI
Y1  - 2011/02/01
N1  - 10.1001/archsurg.2010.322
JO  - Archives of Surgery
SP  - 142
EP  - 142
VL  - 146
IS  - 2
N2  - 
Shirah, Bouton, and Komenaka, of the Maricopa Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona, distinguish the advantages of isosulfan blue and methylene blue in the use of sentinel lymph node procedures for breast cancer. The authors have identified significant advantages relative to methylene blue injection over that of the commonly used isosulfan blue dye. Advantages of using methylene blue include lack of the anaphylactoid reaction and its interference with pulse oximetry. In addition, a significant advantage to the use of methylene blue is the product cost; the authors estimated that isosulfan blue was 80 times more expensive than methylene blue.

SN  - 0004-0010
M3  - doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.322
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.322
ER  -