<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Surgery: Military/Veterans Medicine Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:46:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archsurg.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archsurg.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Surgeons Rediscover, Patient Outcomes Improve Comment on “FFP:RBC Resuscitation Ratio and Post-Shock Fluid Uptake”  Surgeons Rediscover, Patient Outcomes Improve </title>
      <link>http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1392162</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Flint L. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;For more than a century, the perfect formula for resuscitation of shock in the injured patient has been sought. The search has greatly benefitted from the curiosity and intelligence of surgeons assigned to care for combat injuries. A unique feature of combat medical care is the opportunity to blend knowledge from civilian care into strategies for care of combat injuries. The lessons learned are used to improve outcomes for combat injuries and these lessons are returned into civilian trauma practice and adjusted to improve civilian outcomes.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">148</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">3</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">245</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">245</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamasurg.2013.632</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1392162</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Association of Cryoprecipitate and Tranexamic Acid With Improved
Survival Following Wartime Injury Findings From the MATTERs II Study  Cryoprecipitate and Tranexamic Acid and Survival </title>
      <link>http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1392167</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Morrison JJ, Ross JD, Dubose JJ, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To quantify the impact of fibrinogen-containing cryoprecipitate
in addition to the antifibrinolytic tranexamic acid on survival in
combat injured.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective observational study comparing the mortality of
4 groups: tranexamic acid only, cryoprecipitate only, tranexamic acid
and cryoprecipitate, and neither tranexamic acid nor cryoprecipitate.
To balance comparisons, propensity scores were developed and added
as covariates to logistic regression models predicting mortality.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;A Role 3 Combat Surgical Hospital in southern Afghanistan.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Patients&lt;/div&gt;A total of 1332 patients were identified from prospectively
collected UK and US trauma registries who required 1 U or more of
packed red blood cells and composed the following groups: tranexamic
acid (n = 148), cryoprecipitate (n = 168), tranexamic
acid/cryoprecipitate (n = 258), and no tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate
(n = 758).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measure&lt;/div&gt;In-hospital mortality.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Injury Severity Scores were highest in the cryoprecipitate (mean
[SD], 28.3 [15.7]) and tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate (mean [SD],
26 [14.9]) groups compared with the tranexamic acid (mean [SD], 23.0
[19.2]) and no tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate (mean [SD], 21.2 [18.5])
(P &lt; .001) groups. Despite greater
Injury Severity Scores and packed red blood cell requirements, mortality
was lowest in the tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate (11.6%) and tranexamic
acid (18.2%) groups compared with the cryoprecipitate (21.4%) and
no tranexamic acid/cryoprecipitate (23.6%) groups. Tranexamic acid
and cryoprecipitate were independently associated with a similarly
reduced mortality (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89; P = .01 and odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .02, respectively). The combined
tranexamic acid and cryoprecipitate effect vs neither in a synergy
model had an odds ratio of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.20-0.58; P &lt; .001), reflecting nonsignificant interaction
(P = .21).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;Cryoprecipitate may independently add to the survival benefit
of tranexamic acid in the seriously injured requiring transfusion.
Additional study is necessary to define the role of fibrinogen in
resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">148</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">3</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">218</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">225</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamasurg.2013.764</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1392167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>